Israel/Gaza: The Normalization of the Unbearable
The chaos and tragedy that struck the Middle East on October 7, 2023 left an indelible mark not only on Israel and Palestine, but also on the rest of the world. Over the past six months, we have witnessed a series of events that have challenged understanding and morality.
From the escalation of violence to attempts at diplomatic mediation, the post-7 October period was marked by profound turbulence that continues to open wounds to this day.
The Normalization of the Unbearable is a reflection on the issues that continue to influence the destiny not only of the region, but also of areas beyond its borders.
The Reconstruction of Exceptionality
October 7, 2023 changed the weight of the middle-eastern fractures. So much so that the first reflex was the mobilization of the image of 9/11 – in allusion to the plurality of meanings of the attacks of September 11, 2001 – to characterize the exceptionality of the pain and perplexity of the monster event Israeli-Palestinian that Saturday.
There was a lot of talk about 9/11 Israelite and its counterpart among the Arabs. Soon after, it was realized, from both sides, that the situation was even more serious, particular and profound. It was thus noted that the extraordinary – like the 9/11 – had known exceptional features. It had already happened.
Whereas what was seen on October 7th is not yet the case. So that five days later, on October 12th, Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu declared that it was something worse than “Holocaust” and President Mahmoud Abbas, on the Palestinian side, on October 13, classified the Jewish reaction as a macabre updating and overcoming of “Nakba".
The power of these words – Holocaust e Nakba – refers to the worst moments in the history of these heirs of Abraham. Both may well have forgotten the Templar battles and the endless medieval skirmishes. But no one has erased from the retina or from memory the imperative of never more fixed by the context of the ruins on the ground from the battles of 1914-1945.
It was, singularly, horrible. However, October 7th and the following six months made those words – Holocaust e Nakba – almost empty, sterile and meaningless in the face of the true trivialization of Middle Eastern human tragedies.
The Dehumanization of Tragedy
The mental and moral significance of this accident has not yet been accounted for. But it remains impossible to remain indifferent. The 1.200 – or 1.300 – deaths, the more than 100 injured and the more than 130 Jewish and Christian hostages on October 7th, six months later, resulted in 33 deaths, millions of people affected, displaced, attacked and injured and a hostility to the Ismailis never imagined.
Therefore, a brutalization of the lethality of relationships that made any historical parallel and any lexical relevance of words weak.
Rarely in human history has the meaning of the Latin adage that states that one should never joke or play with the suffering of others. Now, in the six months since October 7th, nothing has been more justly disrespected than the suffering of others.
A French parliamentarian came up with the best formulation about the incident when he indicated that the act of October 7th was unforgivable, but not without justification. All observers detained in the situation can, in turn, formulate that the six months of the ordeal in Gaza has its justification, but it also remains impossible to forgive.
So much pain, so much hate, so much resentment.
Pain, hatred and resentment at unbearable levels. But, for some reason, they started to be supported so as not to cause embarrassment. Nobody remains indifferent. But no one finds a solution.
The Permanence of Conflict
The state of Israel, since its inception, has been an affront unnamed to the Palestinians. The memory of Nakba it hits so deep in your soul that even the idea of two states never had full support.
Everyone knows that the creation of the state of Israel only increased the conflicts between them. So much so that it only increased its proportion of cruelty over the years until reaching the monstrosity of the last six months, translatable into the most heinous human, moral and intellectual tragedy of the present century.
Westerners, Europeans and North Americans, were the first to indicate unconditional support for “right of defense” of the Israelis against the Palestinians on October 7th. But when it became clear that this was a revenge unprecedented, they tried to retreat, remain neutral, reframe alliances, say yes with no and no with yes, but it was too late.
The Israeli high command had already neutralized, brutalized, humiliated and penalized the residents of Gaza, as it had never allowed itself to do since 1948. First, depriving them of basic inputs for their survival – water, energy, medicines. Then, sending ground troops.
And then, proposing to physically eliminate Hamas – which everyone knows is an idea destined for perpetuity.
The Global View and Political Positions
The position of Russia and China, permanent members of the United Nations Security Council, were late, cautious and consequential. They noted that it was impossible to support Israel and impossible not to recognize the aggression against the Hebrew state. Postures like this do not indicate hesitation, much less cohesion.
They only suggest that the complexity of Middle Eastern disputes deserves retreat, respect and consideration. No one in Moscow has forgotten the millions of muzhiks mobilized in the patriotic war against Hitler and no one in Asia has forgotten the countless human losses resulting from the North American fury against Japan.
Both Russians and Chinese, therefore, measure well the weight of hatred, pain and resentment in the eruption of tragedies. Therefore, they also know that existential questions for others – in this case, Jews and Arabs – should not be treated lightly.
South Africans, endowed with the moral grandeur of those who survived the apartheid, abandoned this discretion and denounced Tel Aviv's onslaught at the International Court of Justice (TIJ). The applause from the dissenters was impressive. The Court accepted and considered the complaint to be valid. But the practical effects of his decision still await realization, which everyone knows will not lessen the martyrdom of the Palestinians.
Before and after that, the international community, represented in United Nations, indicated – and even voted – for a ceasefire several times. More recently, throughout 2024, it was the turn of the security advice condemn the massacre. But no one seems to be able to contain the fury, desire for revenge and relentless resilience on both sides.
The 7th of October was, therefore, a perfect trap. Hamas harassed Israel into rehabilitating the state of endless war and the state of Israel got on board. As predicted and instigated, no important part of the West remained indifferent. But they were all divided. Some in support of Hamas or Israel. Others in a mere show of neutrality.
The Biden Dilemma and the Jewish Lobby
President Joe Biden has been put in the worst situation ever. His main opponent in the November 2024 US presidential election, Donald J. Trump, promised, if elected, to resolve the situation within twenty-four hours – as he also promised to do with the Ukrainian dispute.
Thus, little by little, President Biden's destiny began to intersect with that of Prime Minister Netanyahu.
O LOBBY Jewry in Washington will never allow the neutralization of Israel's fury. So much so that the Americans abstained from all multilateral deliberations on the subject at the United Nations and the Security Council.
No one is able to predict an end to this new phase of the conflict. But everyone is capable of realizing that it has become insulting to die with impunity for Gaza and unseemly to kill mercilessly for Israel. None of this is bearable. And therefore, it cannot be normalized.
Conclusion
As the conflict persists and tensions intensify, it is clear that there are no simple or quick solutions to the problems facing the Israeli and Palestinian people. As global leaders struggle to find a way forward, the pain and suffering of victims continues to be ignored and subjugated to politics and rhetoric.
The normalization of the unacceptable can no longer be tolerated, and it is imperative that the international community actively seeks a just and lasting resolution to this entrenched conflict.
Edited by: Francisco Lopes Santos
What do you think of the barbarity of this conflict between Israel and Palestine? We want to know your opinion, do not hesitate to comment and if you liked the article, share and give a “like/like”.
See also:
Picture: © 2024 Francisco Lopes-Santos
