---

Please accept YouTube cookies to play this video. By accepting you will be accessing content from YouTube, a service provided by an external third party.

If you accept this notice, your choice will be saved and the page will refresh.

-------------------------------

Accept YouTube cookies to play this video. By accepting, you are accessing content from YouTube, a service provided by a third party.

If you accept, your choice will be saved and the page will refresh.

YouTube privacy policy

Accept YouTube Content / Accept YouTube Content

In many African communities, water is not a distant landscape nor a space reserved for leisure. It is the source for drinking, cooking, washing, fishing and farming, the road between islands, villages and markets.

This proximity means that exposure to danger begins early, and drowning prevention is crucial when tasks are performed without lighting, supervision, or safe access alternatives. Drownings don't only happen in the sea or in swimming pools. The danger can be in an uncovered well, a domestic tank, an irrigation canal, a flooded quarry, or a seasonal pond.

When barriers, signage, lighting, and safe pathways are lacking, the risk increases, especially for children who collect water, play, or follow unsupervised adults along the banks. Inequality determines who can avoid dangerous water.

A family without plumbing searches the river. A village without a bridge crosses the current. A fisherman without equipment works even when the weather changes. A child without daycare accompanies the adults to the riverbank. Each choice seems individual, but all stem from public services that either didn't arrive or remained incomplete.

There is also a problem with record-keeping. Many bodies disappear in rivers or lakes, some deaths are inaccurately classified, and families bury victims without investigation. When the state is unaware of the location, age, occupation, and circumstances of the accident, it becomes difficult to identify fatalities, correct risks, and monitor whether the measures taken save lives.

Dangerous spots rarely require unfamiliar solutions. A standardized cover, an elevated walkway, a buoy attached to the bank, or a fence with functional access can prevent recurring accidents.

The problem arises when administrations fail to define those responsible, set repair deadlines, and allocate funds for maintenance. Without this public chain of responsibility, the known risk remains in place until it affects another family.

Learning to swim remains associated with privilege even where water permeates collective life. Millions of children reach adolescence without knowing how to float, control their breathing, recognize a current, or get out of deep water.

The school teaches it, but leaves out a skill that can determine who returns home after falling into a river or lake, and which should occupy a central place in drowning prevention.

Water education needs to go beyond competitive swimming. It must teach flotation, safe entry, wind reading, life jacket use, calling for help, and non-contact rescue. An untrained person could jump in after a victim and die as well. Knowing how to save someone includes recognizing limits before entering the water.

Teaching requires safety, because an improvised lesson can create the very danger it aims to combat. Programs need trained instructors, tested areas, small groups, ability assessments, and emergency procedures. They can take place in swimming pools, adapted tanks, or controlled natural spaces. The location matters less than the discipline that prevents learning from turning into a new accident.

Adult supervision is crucial during the early years. A child can silently submerge in a household container, a ditch, or near a bank where adults are working. Community daycare centers, protected play areas, and the distribution of caregiving tasks reduce exposure. Responsibility needs to be collective so that it doesn't fall solely on mothers.

A generation trained to respect the water changes habits within families. Children can refuse dangerous games, warn their siblings, demand life jackets, and recognize when a boat is overcrowded. However, individual knowledge does not replace state protection. Teaching someone to survive does not absolve governments from building bridges, inspecting boats, and protecting the places used by communities.

A dangerous riverbank is often a public works project that was never completed. Fences, covers, railings, lighting, walkways, and safe boarding areas are lacking. These interventions may seem small compared to African needs, but they are crucial for drowning prevention and separate routine from disaster. A covered well, a protected bridge, or a sign can prevent a fall from ending in drowning without immediate help.

The routes to school deserve special attention. In many rural areas, children cross rivers, canals, or fragile bridges to get to their classrooms. When it rains, the familiar passage can change in depth and speed. School attendance then depends on the children's ability to assess a current that even adults cannot reliably measure.

Cities also create risks through unplanned growth. Neighborhoods built alongside ditches, canals, and waterways receive populations that cannot find accessible land elsewhere. Insufficient drainage, accumulated garbage, and roads without proper runoff mean that a single rainfall can transform domestic spaces into flood and escape zones in just a few minutes.

Maintenance is just as important as construction. A broken manhole cover, a loose handrail, or a corroded bridge brings the danger back to the same spot. Local authorities need to listen to residents, because they are the ones who know where children fall, boats run aground, and currents shift. The budget should fund regular repairs, not just projects inaugurated in front of councils.

Secure infrastructure needs to respect how each community lives. A barrier placed without a passage can be removed by anyone needing to reach the water. A sign written in an unknown language protects no one. Effective design combines engineering, local experience, access, and enforcement. Security fails when it arrives as a distant order and ignores concrete needs.

In many African regions, boats extend the road. They transport students, vendors, workers, the sick, and goods between shores lacking bridges. When boats are scarce, fuel is expensive, and schedules are irregular, passengers accept overcrowding they would otherwise refuse. Necessity reduces the possibility of choice and turns the daily crossing into a silent negotiation with mortal risk.

Legislation loses its force when it doesn't reach the docks. Vessels must be registered, inspected, and limited to safe capacity. Crews need training, communication, and meteorological information. Life jackets must be available, properly fitted, and worn during the voyage because they are essential for preventing drowning. Storing them in a box during inspections turns a piece of survival equipment into a requirement fulfilled only on paper.

Fishermen work in particularly harsh conditions. They leave at dawn, face rapidly changing weather, and depend on their catch to feed their families. Economic pressure can lengthen the workday or push small boats into dangerous waters. Protecting these workers requires appropriate life jackets, well-maintained engines, lights, radios, and return plans known to those who remain ashore waiting.

There are also the journeys of migrants and refugees in fragile boats where drowning intersects with wars, closed borders, and human trafficking. These deaths cannot be separated from policies that eliminate safe routes. The duty to provide assistance remains valid regardless of nationality, immigration status, or the route chosen by those in danger.

Enforcement without offering alternatives can punish the communities it seeks to protect. If a boat is removed without available transport, passengers will look for a solution. Water safety needs to integrate mobility, price, and travel frequency. A safe system allows people to refuse a dangerous departure without missing school, shopping, paychecks, or medical appointments.

Floods transform streets, ditches, fields, and roads into torrents capable of sweeping away people, animals, vehicles, and houses. Drowning accounts for a large proportion of flood-related deaths, making drowning prevention crucial in exposed areas. The risk increases where drainage is insufficient, buildings occupy low-lying areas, and warnings arrive late, in an unfamiliar language, or without indicating any safe escape route.

The occupation of flood-prone areas is not solely the result of family decisions. Land prices, evictions, and a lack of public housing push households into areas where a building permit should never be issued. Reducing the risk requires preventing construction, resettling people without displacing them from their jobs, and compensating those who lose their homes before the next rainy season.

An effective warning must say more than just the predicted amount of rain. It needs to indicate who needs to evacuate, when they should leave, where they will exit, and where they can find shelter. Children, the elderly, people with disabilities, and isolated residents require specific support. Reporting danger without providing transportation or a destination can foreshadow a tragedy that will remain unresolved.

Preparation requires community drills, marked routes, sirens, radio messages, identified shelters, and equipped search teams. It also requires simple rules: do not cross moving water, do not drive on submerged roads, and do not allow children to approach currents. Repeated collective training reduces panic and transforms information into quick decisions at the crucial moment.

The water remains dangerous even after it recedes. Wells can become contaminated, bridges can lose stability, and riverbanks can collapse. Emergency services must remain vigilant, search for missing persons, and provide care to survivors. Submersion can cause lung, neurological, and psychological injuries, so saving a life includes monitoring the person after rescue.

The WHO has brought together drowning prevention in a proposal called PROTECT, made up of seven areas that must work together. The first is safe physical infrastructure. The second is rescue and resuscitation capacity. The third deals with safety at work near water. The fourth establishes standards for the safe water transport of passengers and goods.

The fifth measure brings basic swimming and water safety to school-aged children. The sixth creates childcare systems that keep young children away from unprotected waters. The seventh prepares communities for floods and other emergencies. The value of the package lies in the coordination of policies that administrations still distribute across sectors without a common budget.

Health services know the dead, education reaches the children, transport regulates boats, and civil protection prepares responses to floods. Local authorities know the riverbanks, while the fishing and labor sectors monitor dangerous occupations. Without authority, budget, and public goals, coordination can die in a meeting before protecting a single community.

The goal for 2035 is to reduce drowning deaths by 35%. This objective seems achievable because the world has reduced the rate by 38% since 2000, but progress remains uneven. Countries with fewer resources continue to account for the majority of deaths. Prevention will only be fair when the reduction reaches the places where exposure is greatest.

The package only gains value when it is incorporated into national plans, municipal regulations, and public service contracts. The targets need to indicate how many wells will be covered, how many schools will teach water safety, how many vessels will be inspected, and how long rescue efforts will take. Publishing these results allows for correcting delays and prevents prevention efforts from disappearing after campaigns.

World Drowning Prevention Day 2026 exposes a political choice: accept known deaths or fund prevention where risk is part of the routine. In Africa, the response needs to start in the places that records don't reach, because a national policy loses effectiveness when it ignores the village well, the school crossing, the informal dock, and the neighborhood ditch.

Technical tools allow us to decide where to build, who should teach, how to supervise, and when to evacuate. What's missing is linking decisions to budgets, responsible parties, and deadlines. Without this obligation, campaigns generate attention for a day and leave the dangers of daily life untouched.

The commitment will be measured by the reduction in incidents at the same locations and among the most vulnerable groups. Each life saved will depend on a concrete chain of protection, from close supervision to distant rescue, under the responsibility of the State.